Sunday, 28 July 2013

Guns Against the Reich Memoirs of an Artillery Officer on the Eastern Front by Petr Mikhin (2010)



Books to read by John Curry

"On the offensive, a private on average lasted for a couple of assaults; a platoon leader for a day; a company commander for a week, a battalion commander for a month. If you keep a person constantly in the front lines for a year or two, he'll go insane. That is why the Germans offered leave of absences for their soldiers at the front. We didn't have leaves. In fact it wasn't really necessary- who would survive to see his leave day?" 

This quote sums up why so few accounts of low level combat from the Russian perspective have made it into print in English. Few in the Russian front lines survived long enough to gain the perspective necessary to make valid observations. This officer survived as he was the forward observer for the artillery and so he saw combat first hand, but was often set back from it, running the indirect fire part of the battle. 

Although there is some Russian jingoism embedded in the writing, it comes across as honest and straightforward. The tactical snippets are many. The German 82mm mortar was their best weapon for killing infantry. The front lines were often confused, just lines on a map, with units too spread out to keep a continuous front. Camouflage was an obsession of Mikhin, perhaps was related to his survival.
Russia was able to win as the American lend lease sent 400,000 trucks and jeeps. Without this, they could not have resupplied their armies. German lost as they did not have enough trucks to support their divisions on the Eastern front. However, after that broad generalisation, this book helps give a good idea of how the Russians won in the company and battalion level battles that all major wars are decided by. The books is a worthwhile addition to Eastern Front literature.

Thursday, 18 July 2013

The History of Wargaming Project and naval wargaming

I played the Fletcher Pratt naval wargaming rules over the years and did some work on the rules. For example, I created a program to create the ship cards needed to play the game. Sometimes, when I mentioned the Pratt rules (and the fact I had modified them), I was asked for a copy. John B. and Tony Hawkins advised me to try and sell some copies of the rules. So I produced a fairly amateur version, which to my surprise sold.

Over a year or so I started to proof read the rules, improve the layout and got the rules printed and bound cheaply by a local printer. Thus started the history of wargaming library project. Rather than just reproduce the originals, I decided to try to make the rules usable for a modern audience. The Fred Jane Naval Rules had an excellent fast play version in them (which allows a novice to quickly get into a game). The book was produced casually and really needed further work, but as I thought 10 copies would sell, and I would know 6 of the purchasers, I thought it was not worth the effort. I was a little surprised to find that when the Fred Jane Naval Wargame (1906) including the Royal Navy Wargaming Rules sold 11 copies, I knew none of the buyers. It has continued to sell.

My next naval wargaming was the classic Donald Featherstone's Naval Wargame. This was the book that did more to launch modern naval wargaming than any other. Its key feature was re-introducing the Fred Jane and Fletcher Pratt Naval Wargame, as well as simple naval rules by Tony Bath for ancient ship battles.
 
I realised that the version of the Fletcher Pratt game we all used was incomplete. It lacked a campaign system, examples of scenarios and rules updates that I knew existed. So over a year I set about tracing the owner of the Pratt game and she did have several boxes of previously unpublished stuff. The Fletcher Pratt Naval Wargame was a new book, full of additional material. I was also surprised to find that Pratt’s loyal fan base were eager to buy the book, not to play the game, but to learn more about Pratt.
 
When I did Phil Dunn’s Sea Battles revised edition he offered me new material for a couple of chapters and then Paddy Griffith (a big fan of Dunn’s book) offered a ‘Hunt the Bismarck Game’ as an appendix. The additional material added to the book and I was amazed that the book apparently launched several hundred solo naval wargaming campaigns.

Several other books have included naval wargaming material. Innovations in wargaming included a naval kriegspiel by Paddy Griffith; Bruce Quarries Napoleonic Campaigns in Miniature had a chapter on sea battles.

One advantage of being editor is the ability to commission more naval wargaming books. The next to go to print is Phil Dunn’s Fury at Sea, which is full of ideas for large scale simple naval wargames. Also included will be the Napoleonic naval rules of the Sandhurst Wargaming Club, written by Paddy Griffith and David Chandler at this semi-legendary club.

The project will include more naval wargaming material, with at least two more books on the subject (in addition to Phil Dunn’s) over the next 12 months.

Saturday, 13 July 2013

Why the UK Conference of Wargamers is the best model for a conference and the worst

In July in the UK each year, there is a unique wargaming event, The Conference of Wargamers (COW). It is a weekend conference set in a sprawling country house that explores developing wargames for the hobby, professional use and academic research. Started by Paddy Griffith, the well-known military historian, it has outlasted several other attempts. Saying that, there is now the American Connections Conference which focusses on the use of professional use of military wargames and the UK equivalent.  There is also the UK London based Chestnut Lodge conference that is non-residential, but it also looks at the subject of developing wargames. Before discussing why COW is the best and worst model for a conference, it is necessary to briefly outline how academic conferences have developed over time.

Academics have gathered for conferences to develop their learning for centuries. The traditional model, until the last 20 years or so, was for conferences to consist of a series of lectures, punctuated by key note speakers. Everyone attended every lecture as it was based on the foolish notion of learning cascading down by listening to established experts in the subject. The radical departure from this was for two or more tracks to be running concurrently, with the audience deciding who to go to listen to. Key note lectures were kept (where everyone attended), as it was too risky to allow the potential risk of the audience the choice of not hearing ‘the great and the good’ of their subject. It would be really embarrassing if a significant proportion of the attendees did not choose the ‘important’ speakers. These speakers might never come again.

More recent innovations have seen 4 or 5 parallel tracks; poster sessions that consist of people putting up a poster summarizing their research and people talk to them in the coffee break; short sessions of 20 minutes (for those who feel they can make their point more effectively in less time), practical sessions (with presenters showing people how to actually do something); and panel question and answer sessions. The latter are opportunities for specialists to be interrogated by the masses, but they can lead to embarrassing moments where existing understanding is overturned by the simplest of questions. While old school academics challenge these new-fangled developments over the last 20 years, most people agree they make conferences a lot more interesting and useful.
COW went through all of these innovations a long time ago and is an example of a new, far more effective and somewhat scary conference model.

The conference commences with a plenary session, this may consist of some great speaker or it may simply be an icebreaker. From then on it is parallel tracks. COW is actually multiple conferences in one; there are sessions for those who believe wargames are tools as aid understanding military history (Griffith school), others for commercial games developers who are testing their ideas/ games (Wallace and Peter Pig school), serious games development (Young School) and for those who are on the elusive hunt of how to make money out of wargaming. Attendees casually move between these sessions seamlessly as the mood or whim takes them.
COW has a timetable, but the attendees dynamically change the timetable as soon as the conference starts. If there is a gap in a room, anyone can fill it with a session. Prior to running a session (a game, lecture, demo, seminar etc.) the session leader puts up a short briefing sheet to describe what the session is about. No longer do people have to guess from the leader’s name and session title what is being covered, they can read a short summary. People usually sign up prior to a session to help the leader organise things in advance.

Even more disconcerting is the lack of respect for people’s job titles. One may have published half a dozen books on the subject (so have many other people at the conference), but that will not stop someone engaging one in lively conversation if they are inspired. This good natured testing of concepts, ideas, game mechanisms, understanding of military history, is like the very finest of undergraduate teaching seminars. However, this rigorous discourse is simply not done at any of the other hundreds of conferences I have been at over the last twenty years.
Some of the wargaming output of the conference has been at the active edge of wargaming and military. The conference has seen some small part in the development of DBA, DBM, DBR, Matrix games, Peter Pig rules, Martin Wallace’s board games, the History of Wargaming Project, Mega Games and countless other wargaming products.

The COW conference is what I term a post-modernist conference. It has not been designed that way, but has evolved into an attendee led conference. What the attendees want more of gets more time, the less popular receives less attention. The downside to the conference is the lively and energetic engagement of the participants can be bewildering and challenges the normal academic ‘pecking order’ that some might be used to. The conference is no respecter of rank. Ideas, concepts, game designs will be dissected, applauded and/ or shot down in flames; often all of these within a 10 minute discussion.  My own view, for what it is worth, is the conference is wildly successful as a tool to develop the attendees as wargamers.
Each conference is a fascinating and unique experience for those taking the time to attend. However, as a more general model for conferences, it is will not catch on. Yet…

Saturday, 8 June 2013

Operation Warboard and Wargaming Commando Operations

I have just published two more books.

Operation Warboard- wargaming WWII in 20-25mm. I traced the co-author as his mother spoke in the House of Lords and the Guardian newspaper was kind enough to put me in touch with her literary agent.

The next book is volume 2 of Lost Tales, Donald Featherstone's Wargaming Commando Operations. This book was never published and the three copies of the partial manuscript were sold in Reading. As it was only 25 years ago, it was  simple matter to track down the owners (in their old peoples homes)... The book is a reasonable recreation of the lost book. An extract from the  foreword by Stuart Asquith is below.

"I find this latest work from Don quite fascinating; really it is three books in one. The first part looks at the British Commandos of the Second World, with an overview history of these troops, along with comments on their training and equipment. Don then relates a couple of the operations carried out by the Commandos – Operation Cauldron 1942 and the assault on Flushing in 1944. This part closes with thoughts on the lessons learned from Commando operations.

 
Next Don offers previously unpublished rules and scenarios for war gaming Commando operations on the table top. This section also includes the raid on St. Nazaire which for me brought back particularly interesting memories of a war game conducted several times where, to simulate the limited visibility conditions, the only illumination came from the players’ hand held torches.

The third section offers Don’s reflections and observations on a number of topics such his combat experiences with the 51st Tank Regiment in Italy during the Second World War, his recollections on war gaming 1927-2010 – which, in the opinion of this writer is well worth the purchase price of the book on its own - his visits to many battlefields, being in the media and thoughts on the late (great) Paddy Griffith.

For me, as noted earlier, this is all fascinating stuff. Don was at the fore front of the war gaming hobby from its onset in the mid to late 1960s into the early 1970s, and in my opinion this is very much a position he that he still occupies.

Donald Featherstone  may nowadays be of advancing years, but the glint in the eye and the cheeky grin are still very much in evidence and the brain is still sharp – take him on in a war game at your peril!

I have no reservations about commending this book whole heartedly to the reader; the only problem you will find is being able to put it down.

Nice one Don!"

Two more new wargaming books are close behind these two.

Friday, 24 May 2013

A Month in the History of Wargaming Project



Finished editing Donald Featherstone new wargaming book about wargaming commando operations. Got distracted as the MOD was not keen on me requesting the definitive list of commando operations during WWII. It was classified in 1954 under the 100 year rule. Sent the final draft of the book to Stuart Asquith for the foreword. 




Book on British Kriegspiel finally finished after three years work. With Arthur Harman who is taking a final look from his expert knowledge on this subject. Peter Perla agreed to do the foreword. 


Paddy Griffith’s 3 part TV series arrived, well 2 parts of it. I do not have copyright, but it will help my next posthumous book from the Paddy Griffith archives. 


Phil Dunn’s new book, Fire and Fury is coming along nicely. In discussions with the author to finish off this new naval wargaming book. He also wrote for the classic victor comic. 


1000 issues of the model engineer arrived as a donation to the project. Not sure what I am going to do with these. Some of the 1940’s issues are entertaining enough.


Operation Warboard about to be in print. Just need another book shop to pay me for the orders I have already sent them and the business cash flow will then allow the print run to be ordered. 


DBA 2.2  selling nicely. David Constable sent me a playsheet for the rules, which is now on my website. 


Ran a WWII Kriegspiel Operation Sealion at my Bristol wargaming club. The Germans had massive fun being defeated. 


Asked George Gush for the unpublished wargaming stuff he mentioned to add to a new edition of his guide to wargaming. 


Howard Whitehouse working on the wargaming edition of the classic book (edited by Paddy Griffith) Battle in Africa. 

The month ended with me being sent information about Russian wargames from the 1920’s and 1930’s. The one about chemical weapons is sure to be an interesting board game. 



Every month I am reminded just how many people take the time and trouble to contribute to the success of the History of Wargaming project. 

Saturday, 13 April 2013

Selling books/ running Operation Sea Lion Game May 12th , Bristol UK

I am selling books in the morning and then a large multipleplayer Operation Sea Lion in the afternoon.

The game is based on the planned German invasion of England in WWII, the original orders of battles, actual logistics. All are welcome to take part in this game.

The initial German briefing is below.




The Fuhrer and CINC of the Wehrmacht                        Fuhrer HQ, 16 July 1940

OKW/WFA/L #33 160/4O g. Kdos.

DIRECTIVE No. 16


Concerning preparations for an amphibious operation against England.

Since Britain still shows no sign of willingness to come to an agreement in spite of her hopeless military situation, I have decided to prepare and if necessary carry out an amphibious operation against England.

The purpose of this operation will be to eliminate the English mother country as a base for continuation of the war against Germany and, if it should become necessary, to occupy the entire island.

To this end I order as follows:

1.    The amphibious operation must be carried out as a surprise crossing on a broad front extending approximately from Ramsgate to the region of the Isle of Wight, with Luftwaffe elements assuming the role of artillery, and naval units assuming the role of engineers.

Each individual branch of the Wehrmacht will examine from its own viewpoint whether it appears practicable to carry out subsidiary operations, for example to occupy the Isle of Wight or Cornwall County, prior to the general crossing, and will report its findings to me. I reserve the decision to myself.

Preparations for the overall operations must be completed by mid-August.

2.    These preparations will include the creation of conditions which will make a landing in England possible:

a.     The British air force must be so far neutralized, both actually and in morale, that it will offer no appreciable resistance to the German crossing operation;

b.     Lanes must be cleared of mines;

c.     Both outlets of the Straits of Dover, and the west entrance to the English Channel in a line approximately from Alderney to Portland, must be sealed off by a dense belt of mines;

d.     The coastal areas must be commanded and covered by the fire of heavy coastal artillery;

e.     It is desirable that all British naval forces should be tied down in action, both in the North Sea and in the Mediterranean—here by the Italians—shortly before the crossing; efforts must be made now already by means of air and torpedo attacks to weaken as far as possible the British naval forces presently in those waters.

3.    Organization of Command and Preparations. Under my command and in accordance with my general directives the commanders in chief of the three branches of the Wehrmacht will direct the operations of their forces employed in the operation.

From 1 August on, the operations staffs of the commanders in chief of the Army, the Navy, and the Luftwaffe must be within the area with a maximum radius of 30 miles from my headquarters at Ziegenberg.

To me it appears advisable for the most vital elements of the operations staffs of the commanders in chief of the Army and the Navy to occupy mutual premises in Giessen.

The commander in chief of the Army will thus have to establish an army group headquarters to conduct the operations of the landing armies.

The operation will be given the designation Sea Lion. During preparations and in the execution of the operation the missions of the three branches of the Wehrmacht will be as follows:

a.    Army. Preparation of plans of operations and of a crossing plan initially for all units to be shipped in the first wave. The units accompanying the first wave will remain under Army control (under the individual landing groupments) until it is possible to subdivide their mission into responsibility for (1) support and protection for the ground forces, (2) protection of the ports of debarkation, and (3) protection for the air bases to be occupied.

The Army will also allocate shipping space to the individual landing groupments and will define the points of embarkation and debarkation in agreement with the Navy.

b.     Navy. Procurement and assembly of the required shipping space at the points of embarkation designated by the Army and in accordance with nautical requirements. As far as possible use will be made of ships from defeated hostile countries.

The necessary naval advisory staff, escort ships, and other protective naval units will be provided by the Navy at each crossing area.

In addition to the protection afforded by the air units employed, naval forces will protect the flanks of the entire movement across the Channel. Orders will be issued regulating the chain of command during the actual crossing.

Another mission of the Navy is to direct the uniform disposition of coastal artillery, namely, of all naval and Army batteries which can be used against naval targets and to generally organize the control of fire.

The largest possible number of the heaviest artillery units will be so placed that they can be brought into effective action as speedily as possible to protect the flanks of the movements against hostile naval attack. For this purpose all railway artillery, reinforced by all available captured guns but minus the K-5 and K-12 batteries earmarked for counterbattery fire against shore-based hostile artillery in England, will be withdrawn from present positions and emplaced on railway turntable mounts.

In addition to the above, all platform guns of the heaviest types will be so emplaced under concrete protection opposite the Straits of Dover that they will be proof against even the heaviest air attacks. They will be so sited that they will command the Straits under all circumstances as far as their ranges permit.

The technical work involved will be carried out by Organization Todt.

c.    Luftwaffe. The mission of the Luftwaffe will be to prevent interference by hostile air forces. In addition airpower will be employed to neutralize coastal fortifications which could deliver fire in the landing areas, to break the initial resistance offered by the hostile ground forces, and to destroy reserves during their forward movement. These missions will require extremely close contact between the individual air units and the landing forces of the Army.

It will also be important for air units to destroy roads which could be used by the enemy to move reserves forward, and to attack naval units approaching the areas of operations while still far distant from the crossing routes.

I request recommendations on the use of paratrooper and glider and other airborne forces. The question must be examined together with the Army whether it would be wise to withhold paratrooper and other airborne forces during the initial stages as a reserve force which could be moved quickly to critical areas in the event of an emergency.

4.    The Wehrmacht chief signal officer will ensure that all necessary preparations are made to establish communications between France and England.

Preparations will be made in cooperation with the Navy to lay what is still available of the 48 miles of marine cable taken up from the East Prussian canal.

5.    I request the commanders in chief to submit to me as early as possible:

a.     The measures planned by the Navy and the Luftwaffe to create the conditions necessary for the Channel crossing operation (Item 2, above);

b.     Details on the disposition of the coastal artillery batteries (Navy);

c.     A survey of the shipping to be employed and of the methods of concentration and equipment. All civilian agencies participate? (Navy);

d.     Plans for the organization of air defense in the areas of concentration for troops and for equipment to be used in the crossing operation (Luftwaffe);

e.     Channel-crossing schedule and plan of operations of the Army, and organization and equipment of the first attack wave;

f.     Organization and action planned by the Navy and the Luftwaffe for the defense of the crossing movement itself, for reconnaissance, and for support during the landing;

g.     Recommendations concerning the commitment of paratrooper and other airborne forces and concerning the command of forces after an adequately large area has been brought under control in England (Luftwaffe);

h.     Recommendations for the location of headquarters for the command echelons of the commander in chief of the Army and the commander in chief of the Navy;

i.     Comments by the Army, the Navy, and the Luftwaffe as to whether and what partial operations are considered practicable prior to the general amphibious operation;

k.     Recommendations by, the Army and the Navy concerning the chain of command during the crossing, while seaborne.

S/ Adolf Hitler